In those cases, samples from the first day were used. A few participants failed to complete all their samples, or all the days. Samples from the first day were discarded, as well as 1 sample from each of the other 2 days. Each beeper went of 6 times per day, for 3 days. They were given a beeper and a notebook, and told to write their thoughts down when the beeper went off. ((Technically it's based on this article from 2011, but the study is from 2008)) This, I believe, is the study that triggered the NPC meme. You're all discussing a phenomenon based not on the actual facts, but on an interpretation reverse engineered from an internet meme. So, they create a much cooler sounding analogy and derive their invented facts from that.įor example, no one here has brought up the original study or it's methodology, it's potential flaws or what it actually says. People don't want to know about the actual facts (case in point, you didn't even bother to link or refer to the study), they want dramatic findings that just don't exist. Which they don't.Īs such, the creation or search for an analogy in this case seems to be actively detrimental. You're using your analogy not to explain facts, but to invent them, by assuming that things that make sense in the analogy also exists in the real world. You make wild claims, implying people without internal monology don't pick out details or formulate thoughts and opinions, but none of that is in the study.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |